Pilgrim Traveller

thoughts on life’s journey…

  • About

Polyphonic Pilgrim…

Posted by David Ward on 14/08/2014
Posted in: Books/Articles, Communication, Personal thoughts, Relationships. Tagged: anger, arguments, art, big picture, Celtic Christianity, certainty, challenge, communication, conflict, culture, dualism, food, Ian Adams, interpretation, judgement, judgemental, opinion, Palestrina, perspective, politics, polyphonic, reason, religion, Rule of Benedict, world view. Leave a comment
Head to Head

The constant need to be right is not only incredibly annoying, it is also terminally divisive.

Perhaps I find an interesting article online. I read on into the comments section to see what others thought of it. The world of reason and opinion are rapidly left behind and I find myself on trial in a judgemental world of dualistic thinking.

It doesn't take long to realise that there are people out there who not only disagree with my interpretation of events but also think I am some sort of deviant thinker, who needs to toe their line or face the consequences. Unless I think the way they do I am clearly a lesser, maybe even a dangerous individual. The 'discussion' often turns to name-calling, threats and worse.

I am a lover of social media, but it presents a double curse:

  • that we can criticise another without responsibility, displaying a total disregard for the opinions, intelligence and personhood of all those people we decide are 'wrong' simply because they don't think like us.
  • that by being very selective about the online company we keep we can live in a very narrow virtual world where everyone thinks like us and we never have to face the challenge of opinions that differ to ours.

I was recently introduced to the idea of polyphony in music when reading Ian Adam's book of reflections “Running Over Rocks”. As I understand it, polyphony is about many voices, rather than monophony, which is 'one voice'; everyone singing the same melody at the same time would be monophonic, whereas two or more voices singing slightly different, but complimentary, melodies all together at the same time would be polyphonic…a simple example would be a round, like 'Frère Jacque” ('Are you sleeping?'). Composers like Giovanni Palestrina have turned this into an art form of multi-layered contrasting melodies making up a beautiful auditory experience.

Somehow, the many voices, interpreting the theme in many different ways, make the experience of listening to the music richer, bigger, more fulfilling, than everybody singing the same melody. There are many obvious parallels to our modern obsession with everybody having to sing 'my song, my way' and the dangerous, yet enriching possibility of many voices enlarging the horizons of our opinions.

I have always believed that the ability to live with things in tension is a mark of maturity, as is the ability to assert one's own views while maintaining the humility to be open to the idea that I might just be wrong. I struggle with this dualistic, black and white, right or wrong way of thinking; it disturbs me as I see all too clearly why our world is increasingly a dangerous place, with individuals, nations and cultures unable to reason and discuss or even to countenance the views or the culture of another. Worse, this face-off and disempowerment is all too frequently the catalyst for the perceived need to resort to violence.

Any opinion inevitably involves the interpretation of the data available, and our interpretations may vary wildly. Culture, age, life experience, social and political ideology, religious belief, world view…all these contribute to the screening process that goes on with every new piece of information we receive. Even those who share, say, a faith background sometimes disagree over the way that faith is lived and worked out in relation to others in the world.

A key idea in Celtic Christian thought, and in the Rule of St Benedict, is that Christ is often encountered in the stranger, in the one who's not 'like me'. I wonder how often I've missed out in meeting Jesus, or hearing him speak, because I've felt myself to be better than someone else.

Accepting that my way of seeing may not be the only way may not only bring me closer to another person or group of people, but may just enlarge my vision and make life richer. Dualistic thinking is narrow,competitive, rejecting, self-promoting and divisive. Polyphonic thinking, by contrast, is enlarging, co-operative, accepting, humble and unifying.

I'm not naïve enough to think that “all opinions are of equal merit”, and for certain views and opinions there is a global consensus that a thing is morally unacceptable…the pitfalls of libertinism, anarchy and syncretism have not escaped my notice. However, it seems to me that a judgemental dualism of those who are different to 'me' is rapidly spilling into every part of life…fundamentalism is by no mean restricted to the religious!

I think it would be true to say that my faith journey has been one of learning to love and accept voices speaking ideas and lives lived very differently to my own. It has enriched and enlarged my life…along with setting me up as a target to those who prefer the certainties of dualistic thinking.

“There's a famous story told of Jesus' opponents trying to trap him into giving the wrong answer to a question. It's a legal issue with political, religious and cultural undertones – and carries potentially dangerous implications for Jesus. It's about paying taxes, and whichever way he answers – with a yes or with a no – the Pharisees know he will be trapped…Jesus answers his dualistic critics with a clever and delightful song of polyphony. Give to the emperor what is rightfully his, and to God what is rightfully God's.” (Ian Adams Running Over Rocks page 49.)

Adams comments that not only does Jesus recognise the conflicting claims, but asks a further question of his own about where true worth belongs…allowing the listeners to add their own voices to the 'tune'.

How we respond to situations where views are polarised is vital. We need to try to step outside the situation and view the thought processes on both sides that have brought the issue to this point. Is there a bigger picture? Do both sides offer an element of truth that brings a broader perspective?

I'll let Ian Adams have the last word:

“Dualistic thinking is deeply ingrained within us. We can think dualistically about almost anything! Politics and religion might be obvious candidates, but it's just as prevalent in sport, food, music, art and culture. Seeing how far divisive thinking has shaped us can be a sobering experience. But we can and must learn a better way.”

 

Posted with BlogsyPosted with Blogsy

If you want to share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Post
Like Loading...

Losing the thrill…

Posted by David Ward on 01/07/2014
Posted in: Books/Articles, Personal thoughts, Relationships, Theology. Tagged: books, C S Lewis, Christian, Faith, family, God, journey, marriage, media, Mere Christianity, relationships, sacred journey, spirituality, Theology, thrills. Leave a comment

I noticed recently, in things I was reading, that several scientists pointed to the writings of C S Lewis as an important influence in their journey to faith. It’s a while since I read any of Lewis’ devotional books, so I set myself the task of finding second-hand or free copies and re-reading as many of his books as I could.

A few of the more popular books are still missing from my collection (‘Miracles’ and The Four Loves’ are the most obvious), but I have done quite well for not very much cost.

I decided to kick off by reading possibly the most well-known of Lewis’ Christian books, ‘Mere Christianity’. This book was originally a set of scripts for some radio broadcasts. I was quite surprised how dated the style of writing and many of Lewis’ expressions have become (the book was published in 1952, the year of my birth), but Lewis seems to have a knack of explaining difficult ideas in a simple yet thought provoking way.

Today I came across this (in my opinion, anyway) real gem, in the chapter on ‘Christian Marriage’, although its application is so much broader than just in the field of human relationships…

…make quite sure you are judging me by what you really know from your own experience and from watching the lives of your friends, and not from ideas you have derived from novels and films. This is not as easy to do as people think. Our experience is coloured through and through by books and plays and the cinema, and it takes patience and skill to disentangle the things we have really learned from life for ourselves.

    People get from books the idea that if you have married the right person you may expect to go on ‘being in love’ for ever. As a result, when they find they are not, they think this proves they have made a mistake and are entitled to a change – not realising that, when they have changed, the glamour will presently go out of the new love just as it went out of the old one. In this department of life, as in every other, thrills come at the beginning and do not last. The sort of thrill a boy has at the first idea of flying will not go on when he has joined the R. A. F. And is really learning to fly. The thrill you feel on first seeing some delightful place dies away when you really go to live there. Does this mean it would be better not to learn to fly and not to live in a beautiful place? By no means. In both cases, if you go through with it, the dying away of the first thrill will be compensated for by a quieter and more lasting kind of interest. What is more (and I can hardly find words to tell you how important I think this is), it is just the people who are willing to submit to the loss of the thrill and settle down to sober interests, who are then most likely to meet new thrills in some quite different direction…

…That is, I think, one little part of what Christ meant by saying that a thing will not really live unless it first dies. It is simply no good trying to keep any thrill: that is the very worst thing you can do. Let the thrill go – let it die away – go on through that period of death into the quieter interest and happiness that follow – and you will find you are living in a world of new thrills all the time. But if you decide to make thrills your regular diet and try to prolong them artificially, they will all get weaker and weaker, and fewer and fewer, and you will be a bored, disillusioned old man for the rest of your life…

(From ‘Mere Christianity’, chapter 6, p 90-91 in my edition)

If you want to share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Post
Like Loading...

Rabbits, death and hope…

Posted by David Ward on 09/03/2014
Posted in: Personal thoughts. Tagged: certainty, death, Doubt, Heaven, hope. Leave a comment

Yesterday my daughter’s rabbit died. We discovered he had an eye infection, so Wendy and Susie took him off to the vets. The eye was quickly treated, but as Carrot was returned to his travel box Wendy noticed that his back legs were not working. An x-ray revealed a broken spine, crumbling as a result of osteoporosis.

They returned home with an empty carry case, and Susie has unpeeled another layer from the great mystery that is life…and death. Carrot was gone for good. There would be no more cuddles, no more baths. That was it…final…gone.

When the tears had subsided she was talking with Wendy about her wider fears of death, suddenly made more real. She confided that she was particularly worried about daddy, “because he’s older than you”. She talked about what happens after you die, her fears of not being with us and the people she loves, and Wendy gently talked about the Christian hope of life with Jesus.

All this made me very sad. A while ago I spoke at what was then our church about heaven and afterwards I was accused of having no Christian hope and assurance of salvation…maybe because I try to speak with a degree of humility that sometimes means I can’t bow to what Gregory Boyd calls the ‘idol of certainty’ the way some people expect.

It turns out that what they said has become a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy. I found I could not share the joy of Christian hope that Wendy was espousing. I was full of doubt. It’s not easy to admit that a small number of negative critical people in an otherwise lovely church have finally managed to extinguish something that all manner of life’s adversities had not managed to destroy.

I expect I’ll bounce back. I usually do.

I’m encouraged by the words of the prophet, speaking of the then still-to-come Jesus (at least, that’s the way I read it):

He won’t brush aside the bruised and the hurt
and he won’t disregard the small and insignificant,
but he’ll steadily and firmly set things right.
Isaiah 42: 3 (Message)

55.800119 -2.210504

If you want to share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Post
Like Loading...

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Recent Posts

    • Missing the Point(er)… 22/12/2025
    • A review of “Domestic Monastery” by Ronald Rolheiser 08/08/2025
    • A review of “Faith Habits and how to form them by Emma Timms 23/07/2025
  • Archives

  • Blogs I follow

    • Downtown Monks
    • Far From Home
    • Northumbrian Collective
Website Built with WordPress.com.
Pilgrim Traveller
Website Built with WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Pilgrim Traveller
    • Join 105 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Pilgrim Traveller
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d